Category Archives: Studio Blog

Stephen’s Synths – Yamaha Motif ES

Welcome to another installment in my column about synths I use regularly. This one is an oldie but goodie, introduced in 2003: the Yamaha Motif ES. It was only the second generation of Motif, following the “Classic” of 2001. Though improved upon in many ways by the XS (2007) and then the XF (late 2010), there are reasons a lot of keyboard players considered it to hit the sweet spot. So much so that you’ll find a lot of Motif ES units in regular use on professional stages and in the inventories of backline rental houses to this day.

Around 2003 I was looking to add to the live rig I used with various “wedding band” cover outfits, which at the time was a Kurzweil K2000 and Roland VK-7 “clonewheel” organ. I also wanted something that could be the nerve center of my home studio, then built around a “Quicksilver” Mac dual G4 and an Ikea Jerker desk along one wall of my literal studio apartment. Keyboard magazine called and asked if I wanted to review the Motif ES and I jumped at the opportunity. They were able to send my requested size, the 76-key ES7. Long story short: I liked it so much I bought my review unit. (Long story long? Keep reading…)

Yamaha Motif ES7

Yamaha Motif ES7

I had spent some time on a friend’s original Motif and was decidedly underwhelmed. How much better the ES sounded to my ears was a revelation. The base piano was vastly improved, the EPs had the body and bark I wasn’t getting out of the K2000 at the time, and the analog synth Voices (Yamaha’s term for patches) had some real warmth to them, with filter sweeps (either manual knob-twisting or programmed-in) standing out as particularly smooth compared to the “Classic.” Specs-wise, it roughly doubled both the polyphony (62 to 128 voices) and the factory waveform ROM (85 to 175 MB) over the original. User sampling was supported via an audio input and up to 256MB of optional sample RAM. One could then slice up the samples and re-trigger the slices a la ReCycle. It was pretty slick.

Why add a digital keyboard to another digital keyboard? Because at this time, digital keyboards were still the name of the game if you wanted lots of polyphony and lots of versatility in terms of instrument categories. Virtual analog was mature by this time (we were at about the heyday of the Nord Lead 3), but available synths were on the expensive side for what you got. Besides, the K2000 and Motif ES had rather different characters, with the former having Kurzweil’s signature flat (some might say presence-bumped) sound and the Yamaha having (to my ears) slightly scooped mids and a bit more production fairy dust on the overall sound. The two together complemented each other nicely, and with them plus the dedicated organ, there was no gig I couldn’t do.

Remember what I said about studio nerve center? The ES was designed to be a beast of connectivity and communication. It had a dedicated control surface mode for several popular DAWs including Cubase and Logic. It had a slot for an optional I/O expander that included optical and coaxial digital connectors. Or, you could put an mLAN board in that slot. Anyone remember that? In the early 2000s, mLAN was an multi-manufacturer effort at giving us the next level of studio inter-connectivity we’d been dreaming about since MIDI.

Yamaha mLAN 16E expansion board

Yamaha mLAN 16E expansion board

mLAN used FireWire 400 connectors, and the idea was that compatible pieces of gear would handshake and recognize each other, configure themselves to each other’s I/O complements, and transmit both MIDI and digital audio back and forth over the network. (Though developed by Yamaha, the company played nice by offering a royalty-free license to anyone who wanted to adopt it. Even though over 100 companies had signed on by 2005, it showed up in only a handful of products and pretty much died on the vine. Too bad, really.)

Of course, the whole Motif concept was seamless integration between the Voices, the onboard pattern and song sequencer (it was a full workstation), and a large library of musical phrases all triggered by the arpeggiator, i.e. motifs. But I was mainly interested in it as a sound machine, so I’ve saved the best about it for last.

The Motif ES and the “Classic” before it supported Yamaha PLG series expansion boards, and on the ES you could pack in up to three of them. Some, such as the PLG-150PF piano expansion, were based on conventional PCM samples. But many amounted to completely different synth engines that ran inside the ES. There was a DX board with a true FM sound engine, an AN featuring the analog modeling of the AN-1X, VL to do physical modeling like the rare and expensive VL-1, VH for vocal harmonies, and more. (I actually found a pretty complete list here.) With the AN and VL boards installed, a lot of the time I felt like I was slinging a baby Synclavier around. In other words, I was drunk with power.

Previous Yamaha synths such as the S80 (which I had also owned) also had PLG slots, but the Motif ES was the last Yamaha workstation to have them before the company decided to see what they could do with simply a lot more straight-ahead sample ROM in the Motif XS, then Flash memory in the XF. But those boards are a big reason I still use my Motif ES regularly. It’s an evolution of the concept developed in the EX5 and EX7 (forerunners to the Motif family), which put multiple synthesis engines under one roof. They were born bit too early and plagued by performance issues owing to the fact that the processing power available at the time wasn’t up to the tasks Yamaha envisioned, at least not if they were going to hit a price point anyone would touch. But what the EX5 got wrong, the Motif ES with PLG boards got right.

The Motif series' immediate forebear, the Yamaha EX5 multi-engine synth.

The Motif series’ immediate forebear, the Yamaha EX5 multi-engine synth.

The idea of multiple types of synth engines is making the beginnings of a comeback at Yamaha if the new Montage, with its eight-operator FM section living alongside the PCM sample-based section, is any indication. The Montage is a monster, with modulation and real-time control capabilities that essentially make it a virtual modular synth. But for great sounds in all categories, great sound quality, and crisp operation uncluttered by bells and whistles I don’t necessarily use every day, I still find myself reaching for my PLG-expanded Motif ES surprisingly often.

Stephen’s Synths – Kurzweil Forte 7

Welcome to the second entry of my studio blog about synths that I use regularly. When you review and create tutorials for gear, there’s always a bit of a revolving door factor. But you find yourself coming back to some things for your own use again and again, out of familiarity or just generally resonating to the way they work. I’m in a blessed position for which I’m very grateful: I get to try stuff out at length, and if it’s not merely a positive review but a personal keeper, I can send the manufacturer a check. (This has mainly to do with the fact that it makes more sense for a manufacturer to sell something outright that to re-process an item back into inventory that now has to be sold at a discount because it’s technically used. To avoid conflict of interest, that possibility is not discussed until the review is written, fact-checked, and published.) To be clear, this is not intended as a full review, just a rumination on why I use what I use.

Such a synth is the Kurzweil Forte 7, and my studio and gig rigs have always included at least one Kurzweil since 1995, when I spent part of a student loan on my first K2000. It was designed to be very upgrade-able, and by adding ROMs and the sampling option I got it up to about the specs of the K2VX – the most tricked-out K2000-series at the time. I was masochistic enough to carry around a giant K2600 for a time (though just the 76-key version), which later got swapped for a K2661 paired with a Yamaha Motif ES7 — in fact, I still have both of these.

All of Kurzwei’s best technology and sound design is currently realized in the Forte 7, which is billed as a “stage piano” in what I think must be an intentional understatement. In terms of the recentness of the sample ROM, the newest sounds in the machine cover acoustic pianos, many variations of Rhodes and Wurly EPs, and Clavinets. The KB3 drawbar organ emulation mode is present, as is a realistic rotary simulation. I’m a notorious Hammond-head, and this is not the best “clonewheel” emulation I’ve ever played, but it’s certainly good enough to make me think twice about carrying a dedicated organ to live gigs.

A fully but not too heavily weighted keyboard, at 76 (or 73 keys), sits dead center in my comfort zone in terms of both playing and carrying it around. I’m not a purist enough of a pianist to insist on 88 keys, and for comping on other sounds, I like it non-fatiguing. The Forte 7 delivers on all these counts.

What people don’t realize about the Forte, though, is that it’s a full-on, deeply capable PCM and virtual analog synthesizer. Kurzweil’s own marketing doesn’t get loud enough about this, in my opinion. Since K2000 days, Kurzweil has talked about VAST: variable architecture synthesis technology. It’s tantamount to a virtual modular synth without the patch cables. Each sound program (and I’m talking about a single program) can have up to 32 layers, each of which is governed by a VAST algorithm.

Example of a VAST algorithm from a Kurzweil K2600.

Example of a VAST algorithm from a Kurzweil K2600.

Really, that algorithm is a series of DSP blocks and routing. You can change the whole algorithm or individual blocks within it, and these cover such things as what’s initially serving as your tone source or “oscillator” for that layer, what kind of filtering is going on, and a mind-bending array of options for modulating this with that, including mathematical functions that Kurzweil programming geeks call FUNs. Geek number one was Dave Weiser (no longer with the company), who just may be the best in the industry at programming vintage electro-mechanical keyboard and analog synth sounds.

The original intent here was to be able to get as much flexibility as possible out of the sample ROM constraints of the ’90s — and it worked so well that Kurzweils began to be associated with a sonic signature sought out by pros.Not that you’re necessarily going to need to, but you dig deep into VAST and there’s a level of brainiac thinking going here on par with the Synclavier. In fact, it’s more sophisticated in some ways, because the cost-no-object Synclavier had the option of just throwing more wave memory, additive oscillators, and voices at the problem.

All of the VAST stuff is in the Forte 7, and when you apply it to the generous wave ROM of today, things get even more interesting. Especially for analog sounds, thanks to something called KVA mode. Sure, you could start with a PCM sample of a sawtooth wave and get a perfectly nice honky brass patch, but KVA repurposes one of the Forte’s main DSP chips to do analog modeling, resulting in very smooth waveforms as raw materials. If you like, it can also set up a simplified signal path for the most common types of subtractive sound design, and you can even download layovers for this to print and put over the sliders. 

For the real history buffs, it’s worth mentioning that KVA mode began as a stand-alone synthesizer that saw the NAMM show floor but never got to market: the VA-1, which I’m making the subject of its own “Synderlla Stories” column. With three oscillators per voice and up to 16 voices, it was to be the most powerful VA machine of the early 2000s. Virtual analog isn’t as much a part of our conversation today, as the likes of Dave Smith are giving us, oh, 16 voices of real analog for under two grand. But to this day, I don’t think that takes anything away from the excellence of the KVA + VAST sound engine, nor from the fact that the Forte basically has an entire what-the-VA-1-was-supposed-to-be hiding out inside.

If there’s anything not to like about the Forte, it’s again the just-okay drawbar organ mode, and perhaps the fact that a lot of the orchestral and other “legacy” sounds (not the KVA engine) are based on some pretty old wave data that was originally recorded at 12 bits and 32 kHz. IN many cases, though, the string sections that come out of the thing sound uncannily good … still. 

There’s no onboard multi-track sequencer, though there are “riff” provisions for adding, arpeggios, drum beats, and other musical phrases to your performance, with up to 16 apeggiators per program. I guess I’d also like to see assignable knobs accompanying the faders, but MIDI control and programmability is so extensive that the Forte could easily be the master controller in a studio where you’re dealing with a lot of “dumb” tone sources such as old-school sound modules. 

At the end of the day, I’m surprised that the Forte isn’t more widely perceived as an aspiring Nord Stage killer. Nothing against Nord — they make great stuff and their immense popularity speaks for itself — but the Forte is clearly out to do everything a Nord can do and more. It does so in a package that on the surface presents itself more like a traditional ROMpler or workstation, and that may explain why it doesn’t have more hip factor. For my money (and yup, I bought it) though, I’ll quote Tower of Power: Sometimes hipness is what it ain’t.

Stephen’s Synths – State of the Studio

Hi there, and welcome to a new weekly featurette called “Stephen’s Synths.” Here, I’ll simply be blogging about different synths I’ve owned or used over the years — some old, some new, some borrowed (such as review gear), and some blue (hello, Novation).

I thought it would be fun to kick it off with an overview of my home studio, as I’ve gotten a lot of requests for that via email and social media. As a kid I also envied musicians and producers who had their studios described in music instrument and recording magazines, and wasted more than a little notebook space and study hall time writing fictional paragraphs as though I were the interviewee. When publisher Russ Hughes said, “Why don’t you do a weekly blog about stuff in your home studio,” a light bulb went on and I thought, “Oh, right, I’m an adult and I can do a real one now.”

I just had a main desk (my computer desk, not a mixing console) break and collapse, which both necessitated and inspired a cleaning and rearranging, so what you see here is a work-in-progress of my trying to “footprint” things and find the right places for them ergonomically. So these pictures are more “display mode” than “work mode” at present time.

I’m currently considering an Output Platform desk, as reviewed by Eli Krantzberg on Logic Pro Expert. The temporary solution you see here, though, is a literal curbside find. The legs underneath needed some reinforcement, which is nothing a bit of Gorilla Glue and clamping didn’t take care of. As I worked on it, I discovered labeling confirming it’s an actual Danish mid-century modern piece. Curiously about this desk, the drawers on either side fit 19” rack gear perfectly. What’s supposed to be a QWERTY shelf (too low for how I like to type) wound up being a great home for my daily-driver interface, a first-gen Universal Audio Apollo with installed Thunderbolt card.

So, enjoy the pictures. In future installments we’ll focus on individual pieces of gear, what I like about them, and what I don’t.

As I mentioned, we’ll go into more details about these pieces, and a few more that haven’t made it back into the studio yet, in the future.