Category Archives: Comment

We Asked Studio One Users What They Think Of Studio One – Here Are Their Responses

A few week ago in a blog post on Studio One Expert, Russ Hughes shared why he loved working with Studio One. At the end of the article, we asked other Studio One users to comment.

Russ said;  “There are many great features in Studio One that make it a powerful DAW, it’s a list as long as your arm, but I love Studio One mainly for that one reason, it helps me get on with being creative without getting in the way.”

There were many comments on the story we thought we should share some of them, here is a selection of the responses.

Users Julian Leal said;

“I tried several DAWS before committing to Studio One and I really love the whole company, support system, online tutorials, and online community of users. This American company is so open and you have quick and direct communication with tech and staff to address any concerns. They really want every user to be happy and knowledgeable and successful with their products, you really feel the love and you can’t help but love them back. Also, the most important thing is that they constantly deliver free updates and their DAW is truly the state of the art and ahead of the curve. :-)”

Rickard Mattison said;

” I’m currently sitting and converting my projects to Studio One and I’m just getting more and more attached to this one. Then there are things I miss from Steinberg but Studio One is just a youth in comparison to Steinberg who has had many years of development in his product. But with this thought, I think Scar Studio One has been set on the right features and they will build on their concept I am convinced. I’m really looking forward to the little details that will make Studio One one of the leading DAWs on the market.”

Bobby Phillips said;

” I’m running Version 3 Professional, and with all the new features they keep adding, it just gets better and better. VCAs, native low latency, better automation tools. PreSonus listen to their users and react pretty damn quick. :)”

User Waynewiz said;

“S1 is great. very intuitive. However, it does hang up randomly like Pro Tools on my MacbookPro. If S1 only had a score editor like Logic, I would be very happy.”

User Madge said;

“Studio One 3 is fantastic. I tried Mixcraft, Reaper and Pro Tools (which drove me nuts and looks archaic) and gave S1 a go and have absolutely loved it ever since. Great interface, so easy to set up, layers, arranger, scratchpad, drag and drop effects/instruments are just some of the features that reinforce my belief that S1 is the best DAW for my needs.”

Niclas Gustafsson said;

“To me its a mix of just loving the way it works and loving the techs behind it. The feeling of involvement in the development of their forums is worth a lot. Sure I miss a lot of functionality from Logic and Cubase (audio editor, extended grouping, etc.) but the workflow, really new and great features and community are totally making up for it!”

User Spidervis said;

“The most important thing was ease of use. If I need to find anything new, I guess this should be there and yes it is. I didn’t need to get a class before using Studio One.”

Andi Gisler said;

“I already posted on FB but it’s worth saying again: I’m SO glad to know that I’m not the only one who was severely frustrated with both the ‘customer service’ and reliability of PT. I take it slow with learning S1 but right from the start, I noticed HUGE improvements over PT. Despite enough CPU horsepower, RAM and a stable PCIe connection in PT I never was able to use higher sample rates except with high buffer sizes.

Studio One? I stay on 96k and buffer size 64 and it works great without crashes, it’s SO much faster than PT and with the lesser latency of 96k I finally am at a point where I feel that there is no drawback at all to record directly in the DAW without any analogue workaround.

Staying with first impressions, the fact that S1 always creates a master fader is great – and it has a mono button too! These seemingly small things – along with drag-and-drop of plug-ins, automatically created busses and auxes – stacks up to being a HUGE time-saver.

Another thing: I haven’t really gotten into the stock samples and instruments yet but played around a bit with Ampire: It really does sound good! I used Amplitube in PT and it is good but what a messy interface and unreliable performance in general. Amplitube works like a charm at no additional cost…..

Last week I had a session where I had to use PT and going back there felt very cumbersome. I definitely will stay with Studio One!!!”

Normally when you ask users to make comments they tend to be negative, however, PreSonus have managed to make a product and create a community that on the whole engenders a lot of positivity, that is impressive.

Perhaps you’ve had the same experience or are you not as happy about Studio One? Feel free use this opportunity to tell your story too!

PreSonus Announced New Products – Here’s What Happened Next…

Rant

Yes, the title reads like click bait, I hate that, in fact on principle I won’t even read links to articles with click bait headlines even if my Mum sends me the link, there’s too much of that crap in the world these days. In fact my reason for writing this article is about something else there is in the world these days and that’s a sense of entitlement that pervades social media.

Entitlement seems to be a modern sickness (yes sickness) because when it goes bad it really goes bad. It says ‘I’m owed something’. It’s not a new sickness it’s always been around for a long time but it used to be mostly associated with some of the rich, famous or powerful who use expressions like ‘do you know who I am?’ However it seems these days social media has levelled the playing field and anyone can be entitled, not only that they can also express it everywhere they want. I saw some idiot the other day who’d pasted the same comment on every part of another brand page, as if that would somehow reinforce their complaint, not as how most reasonable people will see it as ‘what a dick!’

This week PreSonus launched a number of new products, updated rack mixers, budget mixers for live/studio use and speakers… what happened next?

Well the usual happened and the complaints started to appear. How someone looks at a budget mixer and then says ‘I’d expect moving faders for that.’ or ‘no copy of Studio One Pro included… how crap!’ beggars belief. BUT this really isn’t about the specifics of the PreSonus product launch, it’s more about the level of entitlement that seems to underscore a lot of comments on social media especially around product launches. 

I’m 50 this month which means I lived in an age when my first recording device was a cassette based 4 track Tascam 244 Portastudio. It cost me over £1000 in 1982. So seeing a 18 channel mixer which doubles up as a full blown audio interface, with effects built in makes me think ‘shit what a time to be making music in a band.’ Not ‘what!!! no free back rub, car, 2 week vacation, what a f**king rip-off’ Of course I’m overstating the case to make a point, but there seems to be too much of this kind of crap wherever you look, irrespective of product or brand. Again this is not really about the new Presonus products per se, so if you want to rip me a new ass in the comments about them specifically then that will be a huge adventure in missing the point.

It just gets tiring reading endless comments in forums and social media the minute a new product is announced, with mostly vacuous comments by people who think they are owed something. As if the product costs nothing to research or make, as if software writes itself or that manufacturers have no costs and overheads related to the task of getting a product to market.

There may be parts of your life where you are being ripped off and not getting value for money, but I rarely see this in the modern world of music production, gear has never been better and cheaper. I feel the need to break into Monty Python’s Four Yorkshireman sketch at this point but rather than leave the link I’ll leave you to Google that if you want to know what that means!

Write Better Songs With These 5 Tips

I’m fortunate enough to get some of my income from my songwriting through a publishing deal, this means I have to find ways to continually stay sharp and make sure I deliver songs. You may just write for fun, either way here are 5 tips for those song writing based on my own methodology. Please leave your own tips in the comments.

Capture Your Ideas Quick

Songs ideas are like butterflies and if you are slow to respond to the idea they may be gone forever. Each morning I walk my dog on the beach and that is where ideas often start to flow, annoying really as I don’t have my Studio One rig hanging around my neck. What I do have is my phone and I will use an audio recording app to grab the idea simply by singing down the mic on the beach, I also speak lyrics in to. It’s simple and it enables me to grab things so I don’t forget them.

KISS

Kiss (Keep It Simple Stupid) is an acronym that is worth remembering when song writing. I co-write with my song writing parter Jess who will show up with new ideas. What we do is load up Studio One, insert a piano VI, I use AIR Mini Grand and throw her into the vocal booth to track a guide vocal. We may spend a few minutes trying a couple of tempo ideas and checking what key suits the song but other than that we simply hit record and get the idea down to a click. Then we move onto the next idea. When Jess has left then I start to work on production ideas like drums, guitar parts, keys etc. We never spend time messing around with technology, during the writing period the song is the king and technology just gets in the way.

Writing partner Paul Drew lays down some bass

Writing partner Paul Drew lays down some bass

Discipline

We set aside at least one day a week to write, it’s in the diary and is virtually an unbreakable date. This means that we know that each week we have to be prepared for that day with ideas, new mixes etc. In my experience waiting to be inspired simply means you don’t ever get around to writing, when I worked this way I one went for several years without completing a single idea, since implementing this rule I’ve written around a dozen songs.

Hard Work Is Part Of The Deal

A friend of mine once told me that songwriting is 1% inspiration 99% perspiration. Some songs do just flow in one go, but most of them in my experience require the hard work of crafting the lyrics, the melody and the arrangement. Often Jess will come with an idea and then we’ll ‘push it around the plate’ until it makes sense and feels right lyrically. Then we have to make sure the melody is working, then we have to make sure the arrangement makes sense, but I’d like to refer you to  my earlier points of getting the initial idea down quick and then once that is done then the hard work begins of crafting the song.

Me, Jess and Paul Drew in a songwriting session.

Me, Jess and Paul Drew in a songwriting session.

Submit Yourself To Critique

Good songwriting teams need to grow out of mutual respect and appreciation of one another’s talents. One of the team may be great at lyrics, another at the tune, another at the structure – it’s important to recognise those strengths and then out of mutual respect for one another submit yourself to their expertise. It means being open to their suggestions, their critique and their ideas. Sometimes it can be as simple as saying that a word doesn’t work right through to someone saying it’s a bad idea and should be scrapped. If you don’t write in a team then find a couple of people you trust who have a proven track record in writing and then ask them to help you with your writing. 

Summary

For a musical creative there are few things greater than listening to a finished song idea, the sense of an embryonic idea coming to full term fills us with pride. A great song starts with that idea, but completing it takes far more, I do hope sharing my ideas has helped you – now please share yours so I can be better too!

Have You Bought Studio One 3? Poll

We originally ran this poll on June 11th soon after the realise of Studio One 3. We thought we would run it again and see if the numbers have changed since then. It’s a quick and simple poll to see who has bought Studio One 3 and also to see if people using other DAWs have also taken advantage of the cross grade options.

Once we have the results of this poll then we’ll show you both sets of results to compare.

Of course feel free to leave comments on why you’ve made the choice you have.

How To Get A Mix Working When It Isn’t

When I started mixing, I did what I had read and had assumed was the “correct” thing to do. I started with my drum tracks. I always mixed my drums so that they sounded great first (to my mind, anyway), then I would move to the bass, guitars, keys and then vocals last. Guess what I found? Mixing in the vocals after the rest of the mix is in pretty good shape was the most challenging thing for me.

One night, I read a post somewhere on the internet (it was probably Joe Gilder) that said maybe you don’t have to start mixing with the drums and that it’s okay to take a risk and try something different. That made sense to me and got me thinking. What would happen if I started with the vocals…or even with the bass or guitars? I thought it might be okay to try jumbling up my standard practices and doing something completely out of my comfort zone. So, I scrapped the mix I was working on and started again with the vocal. I found that the vocal sat a lot better in the mix and sounded more like it should be there than before. I also had some compliments on the vocals in the track.

So…with this same mentality, there’s a band from the 80’s whose bass lines always struck me as thick, punchy….just deliriously incredible. (For the record, I’m a keyboard player…not a bassist.) Anyway, I have been trying for a while to emulate that sound and I still haven’t gotten there. But, I thought “Why not try starting a mix with the bass?” The bass ended up sounding a lot closer to what I was going for, but the vocals got lost in the mix and the guitars sounded less amazing. So, I came to the conclusion that I should start with the instrument I want most to highlight, but also keep any other instruments in mind that I want to ensure remain relevant and a coherent part of the mix. Of course, you want everything to be a relevant part of the mix and, as you get better and better as a mixer, that will happen more often.  BUT…as you start out, try focusing on the main instrument in your mix (vocal, guitar, accordion, cowbell) and make that sound amazing first. Then, move on to the rest and build your mix around that primary instrument. And it could be that your rhythm section IS the most important part of the track.  If it is, then mix your groove elements first. Just keep an open mind and, if something’s not working, try a different approach.

To more experienced mixers, this may be obvious….or even irrelevant; however, to the new mixer this could minimize some frustration in your learning experience and help you achieve your goal or, at least, get you a lot closer a lot faster.

Where do you start your mixes in Studio One 3?

Plug-ins I Love – The Filter That Just Keeps On Giving

This is a new series I’m writing on Pro Tools Expert but I thought the Studio One Community would also like to see it.

Introduction

My Dad hates curry, he won’t touch the stuff. Oddly enough, he’s never tried it, but he just knows he won’t like it. I’m not a fan of that kind of logic. I think “Try something and then decide.” Of course, there are things that you know you won’t like without having to try them – like a branding iron on your ass or tear gas, but sometimes we miss out on really great things either because we are too busy to try them or have never seen a reason to.

In this new series, I’m going to share the plug-ins I JUST LOVE. Some of them are going to be popular, some not so much. Some plug-ins do amazingly complex things, whilst other very simple things. These are the plug-ins that you will almost always find sat on my mix somewhere because, when I’m mixing, I think  “I know what is going to help that” or in some cases rescue it!

I’m going to choose a different type of plug-in for each post and I hope you will also suggest a similar plug-in that you use for the same job. What I hope we achieve with this series is sharing of our favourite plug-ins.

I’m not expecting you to agree with my choices, or to go out and buy every plug-in I talk about. You may want to try them, but like me you may already have a plug-in that’s a faithful friend to you. If that’s the case, keep on using it.

As I say, what I hope the articles and the comments do is point all of us to some real gems that we may never have tried. Enjoy!

McDSP FilterBank

In this first post I’m going for a plug-in that has very few features but it just keeps appearing in my mixes. It’s the simple filter plug-in from McDSP FilterBank, the F202.

F202 is part of the McDSP FilterBank.  FilterBank is a high-end equalizer plug-in designed to emulate the sounds of vintage and modern equalizers and filters. FilterBank is 3 plug-ins:

  • E606 – parametric, high and low shelving EQ, high and low pass filters
  • F202 – steep high and low pass filtering with resonant Q control
  • P606 – parametric EQ with variable Q modes

McDSP FilterBank is used by a lot of top mixers and producers but even if not one of them used it I would still carry on using it.

Why The McDSP FilterBank F202

There’s a couple of reasons I love the FilterBank F202; first there’s the sound, which for me is just right. Some filters sound very clinical and others have a leaning towards being used on synths, but the sheer musical sound of the F202 means I use it all the time on drums, guitars, vocals, in fact it’s the first thing I’ll try when needing to filter. FilterBank was doing analogue modelling before many were doing sexy vintage GUI models of hardware.

The second reason why I love the FilterBank F202 is the peak option which allows you to add a resonant Q at the point where the cut happens. In practice this means I can clean a serious amount of bottom end out of a snare and still have the low thwack I need. Or I can take a lot of the horrible scratchy top end that is often found when people track with guitar plug-ins but then still get the bite I need to get them sitting well in the mix.

Having the option to cut low and high at -6,-12,-18 and -24db gives a serious amount of flexibility, even the slopes seem to work differently than other filters I’ve tried, perhaps that’s the analogue modelling. With the combination of the filter modes, range and the peak boost I seldom find the F202 failing to deliver.

The F202 may not have zillion features but when it comes to mixing this baby is a keeper for me, if you’ve not tried McDSP FilterBank then download the demo and let me know what you think. It’s also good to remember that F202 is just part of the McDSP FilterBank.

As already said, I’d love to know what you use for these kind of jobs and why.

Should You Upgrade Your Studio PC To Windows 10?

0
0
1
1706
9725
XSIV Music Productions
81
22
11409
14.0

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-IE
JA
X-NONE

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:107%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-ansi-language:EN-IE;}

A new version of Windows is upon us. On July 29th, Windows 10 will be released, and PC users in 190 countries will begin the upgrade process. The question is – should you do it?

Windows 10 offers some pretty compelling reasons to make the switch. At least compared to its immediate predecessor Windows 8.1, it’s set to be a big hit among home users, enthusiasts and IT pros alike. Musicians and sound engineers using a PC also have much to look forward to. Windows 10 offers some decisive advantages and shiny new features over Windows 7 and 8 which I’ll come back to.

On the other hand, Windows 10 looks and feels strikingly similar to Windows 7. This is a deliberate move by Microsoft (with its tail between its legs) to pander to the Win7 crowd who violently rejected Win8. On its official page, Microsoft proudly declares that the experience is “familiar”, that “It’s the Windows you know”, and that “You’re already an expert”[1]. Given that Win10 operates in basically the same way as Win7, the question becomes “Why should I bother?”. This question is especially potent for happy, longtime users of Win7 who aren’t inclined to change something that “Just Works”- particularly when stricken by fear of change and fear of losing data or causing damage.

As a composer who uses the PC for 8+ hours a day at work, it’s important to have an operating system that works with me and that I can rely on it 100%. It needs to have great hardware compatibility, great resource management, and not get in the way of my creativity. The last thing I need is to hit a crash or a stop error halfway into working a client’s project.

I’ve been running the Windows 10 Technical Preview for a few months now on my primary studio computer. The experience has been overwhelmingly positive, with a handful of kinks and mishaps along the way, and has left me eagerly anticipating the public release on the 29th of July. These last 2 months in particular, Microsoft have upped their game substantially, with the beta builds becoming ever-more refined. Thanks to the millions of beta testers like myself providing constant feedback and a herculean effort by the Win10 team all of the bugs that I had with it in the past have been squashed, and I can now say with some confidence that we finally have a worthy successor to Windows 7.

So with that – should you upgrade your OS? That depends on who you are and what hardware you’re running, but on the whole, I am inclined to answer with a whole-hearted and enthusiastic “Yes”. While most of the improvements and additional features of the OS seem small and relatively trivial, when taken in combination they form an arresting case for taking the plunge. With that, I will present some great reasons why upgrading is a good idea.

It’s Free!

Who doesn’t love free stuff, right? Windows 10 is a free upgrade for anyone with a valid Win7 or Win8 license who upgrades before 29 July 2016. And that means free forever – not a free trial or something that will morph into a payed subscription service in the future as some have speculated.

Ease of Upgrade

Perhaps the most dramatic difference between this and the previous iterations of the OS is how it will be distributed. Microsoft has made it possible to do an in-place install, meaning you won’t have to go installing it from scratch, wiping your hard drive and losing your stuff in the process. You may have noticed the “Get Windows 10” icon in the system tray nagging you to reserve your copy. Come July 29th, users will be able to perform a one-click install. Just click “install”, and wait for the process to finish. Best of all- all your programs and files will remain intact. This is a giant leap forward in the evolution of how Windows gets installed, which used to require a clean install.

Should the installer fail for any reason, it will revert Windows back to your current version no questions asked, no harm done. I actually had this happen: My upgrade failed initially, but the problem was trivial to solve (I ran “sfc/scannow” from the command line) and after that, the upgrade finished successfully.

Stability

I can only speak from my own experience on this one – the Technical Preview has been extremely stable and reliable for me – and notwithstanding some slight bugs to be expected in any beta software, I haven’t had a single crash. In that way, the beta has been comparable to 7, which is a great sign. I have installed it on 5 different PCs (2 new-ish laptops, 1 crappy old laptop and 2 desktops) and they have all been rock solid so far.

Performance

There are tangible performance boosts to be had here – faster boot time, better hardware acceleration and better memory use. Windows 10 has lots of under-the-hood tune-ups that can boost your PC’s overall speed and performance (especially compared to Win7 on identical hardware). It uses less memory when it’s idle and less graphics memory when you launch and switch between windows. It’s also designed to run background services like Bluetooth only when you need them. Win10 also supports DirectX 12, which will be of great interest to gamers running graphics-intensive games. I’ve been using it for several months now running some massive Studio One sessions and it’s been nothing but a delight to work with in terms of getting the most from the hardware.

Windows Audio

Something that I didn’t expect to find, and something I have not heard anyone mention, was a vastly improved native audio driver system. I have no evidence other than personal anecdote, but I have found that the default Windows Audio driver has far less latency than it had in Win7. It is also more stable and reliable – I can now mix large sessions on it without pops, clicks and dropouts which was not the case before. On Win7, I wouldn’t dream of recording with the default Windows audio driver, as the latency was through the roof, even at the lowest setting. That all seems to have changed – the new Windows Audio driver can operate with as little as 10ms latency. While it’s not perfect and there are lower latency drivers out there, it is low enough for me not to notice at all. It’s gotten to the point that I have not used ASIO4all in months – meaning I can now use Studio One in non-exclusive mode, allowing me to record stuff while having the audio enabled in other apps like Chrome, Skype or Spotify.

System-Wide FLAC Support

Win10 will make it easier than ever to enjoy lossless music, as it will be supported right out of the box. We’re talking about platform-level support, so any modern or Win32 application will be able to handle the format. This is great news for the proliferation of the format, and should be a great boost to its adaptation among sound junkies.

Windows Store

With the introduction of touch-friendly Metro Apps in Win8, Microsoft continues to grow and expand the number of Apps available in the Windows Store. While it’s still a tasteless joke compared to Apples App Store (Quality control appears to be on permanent vacation…), there are some genuine gems to be found there. I quite like the idea of being able to try out an app, have it install in its Modern App sandbox, and then be able to get rid of it in a flash if I don’t find it useful- all with greatly reduced risk of getting a virus, and zero risk of the app leaving nasty traces of itself deep inside the registry.

Compatibility

Seeing that Win10 runs on a similar architecture to Win7, there should be very few issues with hardware/software compatibility. Anything that runs on Win7/8 should run also on Win10. The overwhelming majority of beta testers have confirmed this. Interestingly, when I was downloading drivers for my old Dell printer, the download page kindly informed me that the printer/ driver was not compatible with Win10. “Damn” I said. But I decided to proceed anyway, and the driver and printer work perfectly. I’ve been happily printing things ever since. Very odd!

Design

Admittedly this is a matter of taste, and with V10, Microsoft have really gone for the modern, flat aesthetic. Not everybody likes it, I happen to love it. Compared to Win8.x, it’s nothing short of a triumph.

Cortana

The new personal assistant is one of the more talked about new additions to the OS. Cortana’s features include being able to set reminders, recognize natural voice without the user having to input a predefined series of commands, and answer questions using information from Bing (like current weather and traffic conditions, sports scores, and biographies). It also includes a music recognition engine, so it can help you identify that song in your head you can’t for the life of you remember the name of.

File Management

The tools used for finding and managing your files are some of the most oft used, and are crucial to any good OS. Windows Explorer, like in Win8, sports the ribbon UI, with most of the common functions visible without having to dig through menus all the time. The search function has also been greatly enhanced, and can return results from within your files & folders, or from the internet. They have made countless tweaks to make managing files that much faster and easier, which, when you do it for the greater part of our day, is a damn big deal.

Start Menu

Not really new, but back from purgatory since it was abandoned in Win8. And it comes with a section for pinning Live Tiles – in a sense it’s a good compromise between Microsofts abhorrent Win8 Start Screen and the traditional Start Menu.

Multitasking

Microsoft playing serious catch up in this department. But to their credit, now that they have made it to 2015, the multitasking in Win10 is terrific. Easily snap up to four apps in place and see all open tasks in a single view. And joining the Mac most Linux distros, Windows now allows you to create multiple desktops and separate related tasks into their own workspaces.

Updates

Microsoft have dubbed this new OS “Windows as a Service”, which is to say that now major updates such as added additional features will be delivered through Windows Update. This represents a clean break from the past, where MS confined its updates mostly to bugfixes and security patches.

This ostensibly means that your copy of Windows will always stay up-to-date, and will periodically receive new features as part of the core OS. For those who like to be on the bleeding edge, this is exciting news. It also means that this will be the last “major” version of Windows- so you won’t have to upgrade again like this for a very long time. I speculate that they will be following the same model Apple have been doing with OS X – One OS that receives constant updates, rather than coming out with a brand new version every few years.

One controversial element of this new OS is that it reduces the control users have to decide when these updates get installed. It’s a much more aggressive updating system than before, and some have voiced concerns over stability and security. Whether these concerns ring true remains to be seen.

In summary, there are plenty of good reasons why you should grab a copy of Win10.  As I said earlier, while no one feature is earth-shattering enough to make the upgrade worthwhile, when taken together they offer an impressive package. The whole OS feels really mature (even in beta) and there are truckloads of enhancements to UX/UI. I can heartily recommend this one, especially given that the upgrade is both free and greatly simplified for current users of Win7/8.

 


[1] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/features

If You Use A Beta And Things Don’t Work Then You Only Have Yourself To Blame

I can hear the groans in support departments of software developers all over the world as Apple announce the public beta of their next OS El Capitan.

There will be lot of people wanting to be ‘first’ and once they’ve got over the feeling of it being Christmas morning in the Apple household then they might find they have a headache bigger than anything they’ve ever had on New Year’s Day.

So for those eager to dive into a public I’m going to spell a few things out, I’m not trying to spoil anyone’s fun, I’m not trying to piss on the fireworks of those who want to be an early early adopter – the guy writing this queued up for the first three iPhones. However when it comes to this kind of stuff you need to note the following.

  • Beta means it ain’t finished and that they want to use the public to help them find the bugs (developers call these issues). Would you be as willing to do this for a parachute or an airplane? So be aware it may not work as expected. In fact in our tests in the office El Capitan developer beta broke Studio One 3 and it would not launch. The public beta may be better.
  • If it does not work then don’t go on support networks or the brand forums and try and get help, they don’t have to support you because it’s an unsupported OS. You’ll only tie up what are already stretched support teams dealing with you when they could be dealing with issues on supported OS.
  • If you don’t get any help then if you go on social media or in forums telling the world how crap the brand is then you’re being silly (I’ve toned down what I’d normally say there as a Brit) and you can be sure that only the other people who will agree with you have also installed the beta. The rest of the world is going to wait until the OS is supported because they have work to do.

Again, I’m not trying to spoil your sense of adventure – I’m simply saying that if you install a beta OS and things don’t work then you only have yourself to blame.

DSP Plug-in Support Appears In Studio One 3 StartUp List

We noticed in the Startup Scripting for Studio One 3, this little tidbit:

…and jumped thinking that PreSonus might be up to something snazzy and sneaky. After checking and discovering (much to our dismay) that it’s also in Studio One and Studio One 2, we were assured by the folks at PreSonus that this is only the protocol that contains Rotor and Fat Channel. It allows their hybrid plug-ins to run both natively (Windows, OSX, iOS) and on their DSP hardware like the StudioLive mixers, RM mixers and now the Studio 192. Any of the new plug-ins that they develop (like Rotor) can be hybrids, so we will be able to run them on whichever platform we choose.

But wouldn’t it be interesting if PreSonus was to create a DSP platform for all their plug-ins? Then, your system could focus its processing power on the actual mix rather than on the plug-ins. What about their virtual instruments like Mai Tail and Mojito?  Can you imagine how cool it would be to have several instances of Mai Tail and Mojito running your Instrument Tracks without putting a strain on your system?  True, we can just transform our audio tracks, but can you imagine?

What do you think about it? How would you feel if companies started making more of their DAW plug-ins available on a DSP platform? We’d love to hear your thoughts. Let us know.

A Frustrated Pro Tools Users Tells Avid He Is Switching To Studio One In Hilarious Style

We’ve all had days when our software crashes and we want to vent our anger, but Grammy Winning Producer Pete Stewart, a Pro Tools user of over 15 years, decided that one time was too many and decided to tell Avid, the makers of Pro Tools, he was leaving in style.

As you can see from the screen shot he posted on his Twitter account he used the feedback form in the Pro Tools crash reporter to tell Avid he was switching to Studio One. He then reposted the screen shot on his Twitter account and included Avid in the Tweet.

Avid responded to his tweet, but that just seemed to make matters worse.

We’ve never known what to write in the crash reports, perhaps Pete Stewart has given us all an idea. You can read the entire thread here.

Remember all those Avid adverts about them being the software behind Grammy winning producers, well not this one!

Welcome to the family Pete Stewart… someone buy this man a beer.